Hi Craig,

I know your not condeming and neither am I. I am trying to understand if there is some value that I am missing. Also, where are the recommendations for that from Microsoft? I could not find anything about control naming in that document. I am very consistent and also pretty much in-line with the recommended standards except possibly on control naming.
Thanks for your comments, I appreciate them always.
Tim

>I'm not saying one is bad and the other good. Just different ways of doing things. Naming conventions are personal, sometimes almost religious. Better to pick one and use it over not having one at all. Just be consistent. What I was pointing out is what MS recommends and what is generally accepted.
>
>>Hi Craig,
>>Interesting in the guide that was posted I didn't see anything about this. I do it because it helps me in intellisense like I mentioned. Not sure what the reason or value would be in leaving this off. What if I have a label and a textbox for a customer name. I can easily use lblCustomerName and txtCustomerName with no conflict. What would be the way to do this otherwise without adding Label or Textbox on the end which I fail to find any advantage to?
>>Tim
>>