>>>>>I worked with the beta of VFP from beta 1. The
>>first few
>>weeks trying to run it under WFW were terrible! I
>>knew at that
>>time I'd have to go to a 32bit system. The
>>question was 95 or NT. As it happened I got a
>copy
>>of 95 (also in beta at that time), and until
>>recently have been developing under that system.
>>Last week I switched over to NT4.0 (beta
>version),
>>the reason is to position myself for web server
>>development.
>>INHO it really doesn't matter which 32bit system
>>you use, but if you are going to develop using
>>VFP, you must use a 32bit system.
>>
>
>Sawaddee Krub (Say "Hi" in Thai language)
>I also find some problems in using VFP with WFW,
>for example, sometimes I change fontname in
>properties of control then it may hang the system.
>However, if you have other problems,please tell
>me. Your kindness will be very appreciated. One of
>my projects is that to make an application on
>Windows but has to limit 4 MB Ram so I have to use
>WFW too.
>
>Pium :-)

Sawaddee Krub .... I hate to say it, but if you have a 4MB Ram limit you should not use VFP! VFP wants 12MB to run. At 4MB you can have a really nice Dos program or a slow windows application. Don't even bother with Visual Foxpro. I tell my clients that if they want this technology they will have to meet certain minimum machine requirements. If you try to give them an application written in VFP it will make you look bad.