>>>>>>Florida all over again:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Election-2010/Governors/2010/1104/Recount-may-loom-amid-confusion-in-Connecticut-governor-race
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Snippet:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Connecticut Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz, on the basis of unofficial results, has declared Democrat Dan Malloy the victor over Republican Tom Foley. But she says the margin of victory was a meager 3,103 votes out of more than 1 million cast.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>By Mr. Foley’s count, he thinks he won by 2,000 votes. On Thursday morning, the Associated Press, which had declared Mr. Malloy the winner, withdrew its announcement and said Foley was ahead by 8,424 votes. But AP did not announce any winner.
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe they were assuming a vote count based on what the machines were preset to deliver (like the Reid votes in AZ).
>>>>
>>>>Say what?! I'm going to go Tracy on you and ask if you have a citation for that. Arizona may be a crazy state these days but we don't hold Afghan elections in this country.
>>>
>>>I should have said NV instead of AZ..
>>>
>>>try (and there are LOTS of sources)..
>>>
>>>http://www.dodgeboard.com/forums/t11336/
>>>
>>>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/10/26/the-seiu-harry-reid-and-voting-problems/
>>>
>>>Another one..
>>>
>>>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/10/27/watchdog-warns-seiu-contract-nevada-voting-machines-poses-fraud-concern/
>>
>>None of those presents any proof at all that the machines were preset to deliver anything, or did so. It's three conservative "news outlets" expressing their concern that something might happen. There isn't even anything to refute. You can't refute speculation.
>
>Ask for links and ignore them. SOP Mike.

But I didn't ignore them.