>Hi Bhavbhuti,
>
>>So what you decide please let us know.
>
>Coming back on our summer conversation:)
>
>I just tried to combine the recent defox version 4 by Leonid and molebox ultra. Did not take to much time and worked like a charm. Impressively simple. I like it this way :)
>
>However the performance penalty for the highest level of protection in defox (line level) was too high for this application. Even when turning off the line level encryption on critical loops. So I currently discard it.
>
>I just expect that unfox IV works as a decent obfuscator. And that the variables names are scrambled in an effective manner. That should be more than enough at current stage in view of the requirements. By the way the code of this application is horrible. That should certainly help the obfuscator:)
>
>François

No feedback on the recent defox IV by Leonid. This tool is free! I tried it and found it both extremely simple to use and adequately documented (à la molebox).

Would just appreciate a feedback on :
- its robustness,
- its protection level against, say, refox or any other vfp decompilers...