>>
Also most security experts agree that airport searches are for public consumption and have nothing to do with effectively increasing security. >>
>>And now we go from naivete to cynical mendacity.
>>
>>What security experts are those?? And precisely how would one "measure" that searches don't increase security?
>
>How would you measure that it does.
>
>And why are you accusing me of lying.
>
>You're implying that I know they increase security but for reasons of my own am denying it.
>
>Here's one
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2010/01/03/bc-airport-security-expert.html.
>
>You may not like Fox news but with your knee jerk populism you could certainly get a job with them.
Yesterday I was thinking about terrorists switching to deliver explosives like drug mules. Lo and behold, it's in the works. Here's one expert:
Expert: TSA scans would let al-Qaida duplicate 9/11
Brigitte Gabriel warns unless U.S. starts profiling, nation is vulnerable
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=229613
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
