You're missing my point completely. You're picking one characteristic and let that single characteristic decide whether someone is qualified for a position or not. In other words, you're saying that one characteristic has enough value to let all the other characteristics be not important.

>>I am so offended by your statement. Does one single and completely unrelated characteristic of a person decide whether someone is better fitted to an important position or not?
>
>>I use glasses, which is one of my characteristics. So using your logic, I would be a good pope.
>
>It's Sarah Palin not Tore Bleken. Of course I'll not say Tore Bleken can be a good president just because he is God-fearing. The former is already a public servant for long, a vice-presidential candidate before; has track records; etc. Tore Bleken doesn't have those...
>
>>>No matter how brilliant a man, s/he can't be a good president if s/he is not God fearing. I think Sarah Palin can be a good U.S. president...