>>>>And, like I said, I guess the intolerant ones may have left (and left the moderators saddled with a rule nobody knows or cares about),
>>
>>Is that what you said? I'm afraid that the Reds under the Bed must have modified your message in that case- no doubt to provoke the Puritans at the keyhole.
>>
>>As for me, I'm sorry for this post, but it's not my fault: the Devil made me do it.
>
>I'm not even deurinated at the whole issue... just wanted to know whether there's sufficient support for the proposal to suggest the removal of the rule.
>
>What irks me is that the message itself, with the stunning revelations about how the housing crisis works, remains practically forgotten.
(I think folks don't want to admit the housing crisis is as nefarious as it is) Frankly, I'm more concerned about the situation in N/S Korea. No mention here of that. No mention of the Pope's decision to allow for condoms either and that is a history making event. (Both are - well all three really are)
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"