>>>>>>And, like I said, I guess the intolerant ones may have left (and left the moderators saddled with a rule nobody knows or cares about),
>>>>
>>>>Is that what you said? I'm afraid that the Reds under the Bed must have modified your message in that case- no doubt to provoke the Puritans at the keyhole.
>>>>
>>>>As for me, I'm sorry for this post, but it's not my fault: the Devil made me do it.
>>>
>>>I'm not even deurinated at the whole issue... just wanted to know whether there's sufficient support for the proposal to suggest the removal of the rule.
>>>
>>>What irks me is that the message itself, with the stunning revelations about how the housing crisis works, remains practically forgotten.
>>
>>(I think folks don't want to admit the housing crisis is as nefarious as it is) Frankly, I'm more concerned about the situation in N/S Korea. No mention here of that. No mention of the Pope's decision to allow for condoms either and that is a history making event. (Both are - well all three really are)
>
>I'm not that concerned about the bickering Koreas. This kinda reminds me of the Falklands War, which Borges famously described as two bald men fighting over a comb. Well, not such a good analogy, since the Falklands could at least semi credibly be described as a war. IMO this one is going to go down as two dead South Korean soldiers and a lot of saber rattling back and forth.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40349704/ns/world_news-asiapacific/