Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA? - Level Extreme

Plateforme Level Extreme

Abonnement

Profil corporatif

Produits & Services

Support

Légal

English

Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?

Message

De

30/11/2010 14:34:55

Naomi Nosonovsky
Wisconsin, États-Unis

À

30/11/2010 14:24:44

Emerson Reed
Folhamatic Tecnologia Em Sistemas
Americana - São Paulo, Brésil

Information générale

Forum:

Visual FoxPro

Catégorie:

Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL

Titre:

Re: Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?

Versions des environnements

Visual FoxPro:

VFP 9

OS:

Windows 7

Divers

Thread ID:

01491162

Message ID:

01491164

Vues:

59

>Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
>Note that both functions returns the same number of records and uses the same SelectCmd...

I would expect CursorRefresh to be faster in a parameterized query.

If it's not broken, fix it until it is.

My Blog

Click here to load this message in the networking platform