Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
Message
From
01/12/2010 03:20:02
Fabio Lunardon
Lunacom
Marostica, Italy
 
 
To
30/11/2010 14:24:44
Emerson Reed
Folhamatic Tecnologia Em Sistemas
Americana - São Paulo, Brazil
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Title:
Re: Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9
OS:
Windows 7
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01491162
Message ID:
01491325
Views:
62
>Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
>Note that both functions returns the same number of records and uses the same SelectCmd...

CursorFill()
create the CA.Alias dbf

CursorRefresh()
1. create a temp dbf
2. copy temp.dbf into the CA.Alias dbf

the step 2. can require enough time,
and this force the dbf structure to not change
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform