Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
Message
From
01/12/2010 03:32:41
Lutz Scheffler
Lutz Scheffler Software Ingenieurbüro
Dresden, Germany
 
 
To
01/12/2010 03:29:18
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9
OS:
Windows 7
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01491162
Message ID:
01491329
Views:
58
>>>>Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
>>>>Note that both functions returns the same number of records and uses the same SelectCmd...
>>>
>>>CursorFill()
>>>create the CA.Alias dbf
>>>
>>>CursorRefresh()
>>>1. create a temp dbf
>>>2. copy temp.dbf into the CA.Alias dbf
>>>
>>>the step 2. can require enough time,
>>>and this force the dbf structure to not change
>>
>>Hi Fabio,
>>
>>are your shure?
>>
>>the DBF() is someting like SYS(2015)+'.DBF'
>>I can see DBF(CA.ALIAS) change with every CursorRefresh.
>>I run in this indexing a CA / View after Requery / CursorRefresh
>>
>>Agnes
>
>try to attach the CA.alias to a Grid.

Done
DBF() changes with every cursorrefresh Simple to see on Statusbar

No idea why the grid should make a difference
Words are given to man to enable him to conceal his true feelings.
Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord

Weeks of programming can save you hours of planning.

Off

There is no place like [::1]
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform