>>>>>>Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
>>>>>>Note that both functions returns the same number of records and uses the same SelectCmd...
>>>>>
>>>>>CursorFill()
>>>>>create the CA.Alias dbf
>>>>>
>>>>>CursorRefresh()
>>>>>1. create a temp dbf
>>>>>2. copy temp.dbf into the CA.Alias dbf
>>>>>
>>>>>the step 2. can require enough time,
>>>>>and this force the dbf structure to not change
>>>>
>>>>Hi Fabio,
>>>>
>>>>are your shure?
>>>>
>>>>the DBF() is someting like SYS(2015)+'.DBF'
>>>>I can see DBF(CA.ALIAS) change with every CursorRefresh.
>>>>I run in this indexing a CA / View after Requery / CursorRefresh
>>>>
>>>>Agnes
>>>
>>>try to attach the CA.alias to a Grid.
>>
>>Done
>>DBF() changes with every cursorrefresh Simple to see on Statusbar
>>
>dbf here does not change.
>
>>No idea why the grid should make a difference
>
>Grid do not like if recordsource file handle change

I have no idea what you are refreing too.
I use a CA bound to a grid with Cursorrefresh since the time the CA was introduced. I have replaced the views (formerly used) with CA and have no problems with grids at all.