Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
Message
From
01/12/2010 07:51:19
 
 
To
01/12/2010 06:57:26
Lutz Scheffler
Lutz Scheffler Software Ingenieurbüro
Dresden, Germany
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9
OS:
Windows 7
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01491162
Message ID:
01491355
Views:
43
>>>>Grid do not like if recordsource file handle change
>>>
>>>I have no idea what you are refreing too.
>>>I use a CA bound to a grid with Cursorrefresh since the time the CA was introduced. I have replaced the views (formerly used) with CA and have no problems with grids at all.
>>
>>That is what Fabio means - as you have no problems with grids, CA must at least "shimmy" the "Safe Select" needed for normal cursors - you have to zap the Bound source and append from the new data...
>
>So this means the grid uses a copy of the DBF() ?

Have not tracked it with Filemon or similar, as I was just glad it worked
and made gymnastics like safe select or the property dance of all columns unnecesary.

But there must be some internal switcharound
to make the grid believe the source remains the same.

regards

thomas
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform