Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
Message
De
02/12/2010 13:20:10
 
 
À
02/12/2010 10:42:09
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9
OS:
Windows 7
Divers
Thread ID:
01491162
Message ID:
01491605
Vues:
63
Fabio,

CursorRefresh does not create a copy,
it do a ZAP ("CA: Alias") and fills it


You are right there. However, if you change SelectCmd, like change or add the ORDER or WHERE clause, CursorRefresh() will still 'respect' the existing SelectCmd and not the new one. If something is changed in SelectCmd, one has to do a CursorFill(), therefore a new cursor will have been created. This will blank the grid.

Dennis
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform