Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
No Christmas for the Red Cross
Message
From
19/12/2010 15:12:39
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01493012
Message ID:
01493307
Views:
59
>>>>>>>That said, I don't think Christians have any right to try to take ownership of this time of year. The percentage of Americans who are Christian has been falling and is now around 75%. It's probably even lower if it were possible to accurately count those who say they are only because they're afraid not to. Christian beliefs and agendas do not speak for all of us and they certainly do not speak for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then you and the rest of the 25% do not need to celebrate Christmas right? You wouldn't want to be a hypocrite.
>>>>>
>>>>>I didn't. Actually, it was the best time of the year to get some work done and make up for the days when I just couldn't concentrate or just couldn't. The users are dismissed, cool.
>>>>
>>>>And, of course we don't think muslims should mention ramadan, let alone moon rocks thrown at the earth by allah. And the jewish people must hide their hanaka stuff from our eyes. Instead, why not allow any religion to put up any display on their property any time they wish. Those who are offended may avert their eyes as they pass by. I'm tired of the PC laws. Bottom line - We are all somewhat free individuals and as such we should just get on with the enjoyment of our short time on the planet as a living being. Have I ranted enough?
>>>
>>>I am not familiar with the Canadian constitution but here the founders specifically separated church and state. Most of them were Christian but they had seen enough examples of theocracies run amok that they wanted to avoid it. We have freedom of religion. We also have freedom FROM religion. This is not political correctness. It is one of the principles this country was founded on.
>>
>>Actually, they said :
>>
>>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
>>
>>No question that we are individually free to practice or not any religion or lack thereof. But I think it is a stretch to say they were trying to protect us from being exposed to other practicing their religion.
>>
>>Personally I am only a Christian culturally but I don't see where any religious symbols anyplace that honor the origin of the holiday ( or at least the origin of the holiday that co-opted winter soltce rites that long pre-date the first Christmas ) are any more offensive than folk dancing. I think a theocracy riding in on Santa's sleigh or following a star to the manger is the least of our worries. <g>
>
>I am not offended, either. I just don't think Christmas trees, menorah, etc. have any place other than in houses of worship. And I think that was the intention of the founders. Your lame argument does not persuade me.

So you've never had a christmas tree? You believe christmas trees should only be in churches? They didn't originate in a church.... at least we don't dance around it and burn it when done like used to be the case... :o)
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform