Here we go again, there is NO virtual unanimity between serious scientists on global warming... they are split down the middle

JB, actually, you're wrong....they're not split down the middle. Global warming as such is more a political term than a scientific one. It makes for good reading for those who want to use it as a pretext for social change, to fuel their sense of envy and to push things like cap and trade.

It also makes for good reading of just how much of a coward Al Gore is (for refusing to debate dissenting scientists), and for the level of dshonesty re: IPCC and Kyoto. As much as I've grown conflicted about Glenn Beck, about a year ago he did a series of shows that exposed just how far some have tried to cheat to push GWT. (Which led to additional reporting to confirm Beck's claims).

Questions about groundstation readings to inflate temperature readings, lies to the American public about atmospheric CO2 levels and how much is man-made, manipulation by IPCC bureaucats to force scientists to accelerate warming rate projections....all one big freaking scam.

With each passing month, more reports of scientists who have come out in regret of their participation in one of the biggest hoaxes we've ever seen. It makes the anti-nuclear energy protesters in the 1980's seem intelligent by comparison.

One can have a legitimate concern for the planet and still smell political phonies.