>>>>>>How about if we say that all of that is over the line? Anyone on either side suggesting or even hinting that the right way to deal with a political opponent is with a weapon is behaving badly, in my book.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tamar, just a yes/no....do you think the Palin crosshairs map is "suggesting or hinting that the right way to deal with a political opponent is with a weapon"?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes. I'd put that in the "hinting" category.
>>>>>
>>>>>Tamar
>>>>
>>>>What would you think of a statement like "If they bring a knife to the fight, we'll bring a gun." ?
>>>
>>>Since I've read much of the thread already, I know the context. I think it was a poor choice to say it.
>>>
>>>Tamar
>>
>>But not "hinting?" The same rules need to apply to all. The rhetoric has been out of control since our early presidential elections, however, the media is selective in its coverage now. Responsible leaders need to stop.
>
>The "if" portion of the sentence mitigates to me the other part. It's not starting a fight. I still think it was a stupid thing to say.
>
>
>>(From another message)
>>
>>Take a look at these signs:
>>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621
>>
>>and look at these links:
>>http://beforeitsnews.com/story/350/125/The_Face_of_Hate.html
>>
>>Funny how that stuff wasn't plastered all over the news...
>>
>>Ignorance is everywhere - every presidential term:
>>http://www.cafemom.com/group/99198/forums/read/10955150/Even_ignorance_is_protected_under_the_1st_amendment
>
>
>Yep, most of that was wrong. That said, in my view, there is a difference between what individuals do and what elected officials or candidates do. The latter should be held to a higher standard.
>
>Tamar


I agree with you. Leaders need to be held to a higher standard. However, I disagree that including the "if" in his statement mitigates it in any way or excuses it. It was irresponsible and contributed to the dangerous climate.