>>>>>>How about if we say that all of that is over the line? Anyone on either side suggesting or even hinting that the right way to deal with a political opponent is with a weapon is behaving badly, in my book.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tamar, just a yes/no....do you think the Palin crosshairs map is "suggesting or hinting that the right way to deal with a political opponent is with a weapon"?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes. I'd put that in the "hinting" category.
>>>>>
>>>>>Tamar
>>>>
>>>>What category would you put this in?
>>>>
>>>>http://www.newscopy.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/dlc-targeting-map.gif
>>>
>>>Similar. Not quite the same, but probably also a bad choice.
>>>
>>>Tamar
>>
>>Why isn't it quite the same?
>
>To me, a plain target symbol is less inflammatory than one with crosshairs. Crosshairs to me suggest weapons and snipers in a way that the target alone doesn't. That doesn't mean that others don't respond differently.
>
>I think in both cases, it would have been better to just use a dot.
>
>Tamar

Wow. Really? What is the purpose of a target?