>>>>>>>http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml
>>>>>>
>>>>>>All the current middle east news (especially Egypt) is amazing.
>>>>>
>>>>>Indeed
>>>>>http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22963
>>>>
>>>>I wouldn't want to be found on the same side of the street with anyone who wants to be on the same side of the street with Brzezinsky... only Kissinger is in the same category of bad guys.
>>>
>>>Hitler and Stalin may deserve consideration as well. Or Mao. Or Pol Pot. Or any number of African and South American dictators. Are you awarding extra credit to B and K because they were American? ;-)
>>
>>No, because they masterminded a lot of awful stuff that happened in their time. Being American has only to do with the resources available to them. They may have done less damage to the world, had they been elsewhere.
>>
>>And the category I have in mind is very specific: cause the most harm, deploy most devious plan, without actually publishing most of them, until much later. Only Stalin, from your list, comes close in this secrecy - about what others did you could read within a few days or months. These two usually had about 20 years between the deed and going public with it - again, only Stalin is in the same league, his stuff from thirties wasn't widely known until the fifties, and that was when he died.
>
>When you tell me Zbigniew Brzezinski did more harm than Hitler, I stop listening. Nothing personal.

You mentioned Hitler. I didn't. And I said "in their time" - which was after WWII, so, again, not the same category.

If you want to catch me in something, you would need to divert more funds to appropriate a considerable consideration invest in attention :).