>>I find it quite amazing that you haven't admitted you were wrong. As I said to your soul brother, would it kill you to admit you were wrong?
>>
>>You crack me up with this "soul brother" business.... seems that when we hear this "would it kill you to admit", it's when you're jumping to a hasty conclusion of the person being wrong.
>>
>>And no, it won't kill me to admit when I'm wrong. I was wrong on the information I said that wasn't available on Obama..."some" of it was, but still a significant amount wasn't. This is still a president for whom a great deal of non-trivial information isn't available.
>>
>>But back to the original point - where was she wrong? Her original post was a link and a quote from the article's text. I think there are a couple of interesting points in the numbers.
>
>
>Interesting does not mean correct. I respect both you and Tracy but you manufacture evidence all the time. You provoke me with no good reason. The wise man's path would be to to work on the genuinely crazy things in my head and walk on down the road.

Removed. Not engaging.