>>Hi,
>>
>>I wanted to be sure that results I see are consistent with the way CA should work and not something that I am missing.
>>
>>Say I have a cursor created with CA object. Then I change a value in one of the fields of a record. I DO NOT call TableUpdate. Then I delete this record in the cursor (of CA object). And then I call TableUpdate(). What I see in the base table is deleted record with NO changes I did prior to deletion of the record. Is this how CA should work and works?
>>
>>TIA.
>
>Are you using CA against VFP table? What is the buffering mode? Also, can you catch the DeleteCmd, UpdateCmd, etc. by placing the code in the appropriate methods of CA to get them?
This is the case of VFP table. The buffering is 5. There is no custom value specified in DeleteCmd and UpdateCmd. My question is, do the results I see (described above) are the way CA should work.
"The creative process is nothing but a series of crises." Isaac Bashevis Singer
"My experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better, they don't know anything at all." Oscar Wilde
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." W.Somerset Maugham
