Same argument applies to ADO.NET - that's still the undelying mechanism for all .NET data access.

>But MVC is not a successor or alternative to ASP.NET. It is the MVC architecture/pattern applied to ASP.NET, not a product. You can't go out and buy MVC. I am not knocking it, at all -- it seems like a great approach -- just distinguishing it from a product, which remains ASP.NET.
>
>>No, because of MVC (now at verson 3)
>>
>>>ASP.NET is on that list? Are you suggesting ASP.Net is old technology because of Silverlight?
>>>Tim