>Fair enough. So was your point that ASP.NET is "old technology" if it isn't used with the MVC architecture?

MVC uses a different approach than ASP.NET. You don't have web forms, for example.

>
>I don't have numbers on this but my guess is there is still lots of non-MVC ASP.NET work going on. Probably even a large majority of it. You are unusually plugged in to the most current Microsoft directions, more so than most developers and certainly more so than most shops. I don't have to tell you that corporate shops tend to adopt new technology cautiously. The soup du jour is about the last thing on the menu most of them want to order. In my experience, anyway.

There is a big difference between developing a new app and enhancing/maintaining existing apps. If a new app, then newer technologies should be considered.

Also, keep in mind that I work for a Fortune 100. Even more so, I develop apps for hospital use, and health care is notoriously slow at adopting new technology unless it is used directly for patient care (my apps are not).