>I've got a method which process 14000 records in a scan loop. On the older machine, the process might take 10 minutes. The new machine takes hours. I've attempted to adjust the paging file memory size, but this hasn't helped.
>
>In the scan loop, there is a replace which is not optimized which is taking about 3 secords per record on the new machine. I realize that the process needs to be optimized but I'm short of time and I don't have time to do it now.
>
>Why would there be such a disparity in time?
>
>The code is identical. The other major change is upgrading from VFP 8 to VFP 9.

Is it one record replace or multi-records replace? Also, do you have triggers / rules in the database that are fired along with the replace?