Thank you. For once we get past all the MS marketing FUD! But even I'll give the title of best to PHP since it is the easiest tool and has the most and best 3rd party apps. If VFP can even come close to PHP in that regard plus VFP's improved performance (ActiveVFP) , I think we'll have a real winner on our hands...

I ran the same tests I ran on ASP.NET and PHP. It was as I expected: .NET was first, then ActiveVFP and then PHP (which, remember is the #1 web tool). But, of course, many other factors explain why most users would pick a technically inferior product (PHP) over .NET.

>OK. You win - VFP is the ideal tool for a web hosted application. Period :-}

>Oh, btw, what tool did you use for stress testing and what tests did you run ?