>>>Yes, when we used DBC. I don't remember having any problems.
>>
>>Thank you very much. From your words "when we used DBC" I understand that your company product is already switched to SQL Server, right?
>
>The place where I work now switched to SQL long time ago, so I came into already working environment. We're using SPT here and also updatable remote views using method very similar to what Vlad G described in his FAQ to make SPT cursor updatable.
>
>I meant the other place. There we used DBC, RI, default values, etc. I know they wanted to switch first back-end to SQL Server and then front-end. I'm not sure what is the status of this project right now but I believe it's still going as I see from occasional questions by the person who works there now.
Thank you for sharing the information. Funny that I started my VFP-2-SQL Server using SPT but now switched to CursorAdapter. I find (and it is maybe just my personal experience) CA approach is easier to implement (less code which in my case means fewer bugs :))
"The creative process is nothing but a series of crises." Isaac Bashevis Singer
"My experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better, they don't know anything at all." Oscar Wilde
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." W.Somerset Maugham
