>>>Sure. They can say whatever they like at their 'church'.
>>
>>I said the same about invading public space with Christmas, but was overruled. So you can't have it both ways.
>
>"Merry Christmas" and Christmas trees are not designed to cause great emotional distress to anyone. If they do cause great emotional distress I suggest the person (persons) undergoing such distress jump under a speeding bus and end it all.
>
>These bas+urds involved in the case at hand are intentionally doing emotional harm.

Hey that's a good point - which makes me think of something.... it's actually possible to sue someone for "emotional distress" http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/emotional+distress - perhaps someone will take up the cause.

>>They should be tried under some murky law about hate speech or other verbal crime thing.