>>>As for the 256 character question I hadn't run into that one, and wasn't aware of the limitation. However, using AT() to break the string into smaller pieces would probably be the first thing that I'd look at doing as a workaround.
>>
>>Hows it goin' George?
>>
>>The limitation isn't at all obvious :-) and, yep, you can write your own Words/Wordnum routines but they're two orders of magnitude slower than the .fll; even in VFP6 which seems to have superior string handling.
>>
>>I wonder if Walt Kennamer (a really nice guy, who wrote the original Foxtools) is still around and could patch up what's left of Foxtools.fll??
>
>Hi David,
>
>I'm just enjoying myself here in Chicago.
>
>I know that the MS folks are still changing and modifying it. In fact, they added three functions so latest version, so I think that they might be able to do something with these two.
>
>I wasn't suggesting that we write our own, just break the string up into a couple of pieces. I still think that it'd be at least two orders slower.:-)

Hi George,

Chicago - must be going to get cold pretty soon, so you gotta enjoy it now eh? :-)
You mean "latest version" as in SP2?
I see, you meant break the string up and pass the chunks to foxtools. I missed that interpretation.