General information
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Environment versions
Network:
Windows 2003 Server
>>(1) amembers and eval() seem fast enough. I do not think that that would be a bottleneck - should it be then you can generate the >>code for each table object
I read somewhere that AMEMBERS is pretty slow.
>>(2) What do you do when two (or more) fields have changed ? One replace statement or more than one ?
I was doing a replace for each, but have now switched to UPDATE, I am testing results.
>> (3) Can you find the bottleneck in the .Save() method ?
Coverage profile does not identify a slow line but it's the AMEMBERS, FOR..ENDFOR
>> (4) update : with/endwith is about 11 % faster
Yes I am already doing that.
Gary.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only