Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
France sets the stage
Message
From
11/03/2011 08:44:15
 
 
To
11/03/2011 08:34:14
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01503311
Message ID:
01503318
Views:
39
>>>http://www.france24.com/en/20110310-France-NTC-national-transitional-council-embassy-Libya
>>>
>>>We've all seen the latest video of government forces destroying the rebels and civilians in Libya. Does anyone hear the whispers of backroom deals???? How many more countries before the U.S. does the same? Is the U.S. waiting to see the political fallout before making a decision? Is it waiting for a (behind closed doors) agreed upon international calling for the U.S. to take a stance? Is this an attempt to keep the U.S. from being a target for being the first or is the U.S. really behind on this one? Either our leadership really doesn't believe in supporting the transitional council of the rebels (yet) or it is now not willing to stick its neck out for political freedom when it may hurt its image in the Arab world. I guess the U.S. now (by appearances) only stands up for democracy and political freedom when it is politically advantageous to it. I've heard a lot of "don't do anything" as well as "we are no longer the first in supporting democracy and political freedom" comments in the news by supposed experts....both sides make "sense" but what is the right thing to do for the Libyan people and for the U.S.?
>>
>>Its worth remembering that its not as simple as get rid of Gadaffi.
>>
>>He has a lot of support and careless intervention leading to the Benghazi side getting the upper hand could create another (well armed) insurgency problem. Letting the two side slug it out and then come to a deal themselves may be the best solution. What you probably don't want is for one side to win easily.
>
>I agree, but it is interesting that the same rhetoric claiming support for the people Egypt has not been public by this country for the Libyan people. The U.S. state department and President Obama made numerous statements of support for the Egyptian people and it was televised here continuously. Not so for Libya. Is it because Egypt was peaceful demonstrations and Libyan has moved into armed rebels? Was there political repercussions after the comments for Egypt that we are not aware of? Is it fear of more support having greater repercussions of rolling across more Arab states?

maybe they've decided its France and Sarkozys turn to lead the free world :-)
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform