Jim,

I fully understand the concept you wish for. As I said in the first message, I completely disagree with it.

If you choose to disagree with the mechanics of VFL object references I won't belabor the point anymore.

>I really *do* appreciate the trouble you have gone to here.
>However, I feel you are missing the concept I am trying to get at.
>
>But since you have your mind made up on the issue, I will refrain from further commentary.