>Depends on which projection you look at. Jerry Palm has the Aggies a 10 seed this morning, potentially facing Duke in the second round
>
>I realize it's speculation, but Joe Lunardi is usually pretty accurate.
>
>Putting the Aggies as a 10 seed and possibly facing Duke means that the selection team would view teams like Missouri and George Mason and Gonzaga as higher seeds than the Aggies. I rather doubt that will happen.
>
>Granted the Aggies S.O.S. is still a bit questionable, but their overall record should probably still be high enough to keep them where they are. But we'll find out in about 6 hours....

Harvard got reamed. With 68 teams in it now, a team with a record of 23-6 and an RPI of 37 belongs, especially with the ACC, Big Ten, and SEC all having down years. The selection committee is on automatic pilot.

I also have no idea how Pitt got a #1 seed with their late season slump. Maybe it's tribute to a conference that is sending 11 teams.

I am going to have fun watching it and cheering for every underdog.