>>>>>>And we don't even know about the radiation yet. (At least we won't be hearing for a while about how safe and economical nuclear energy is).
>>>>>
>>>>>On the contrary - if you have any interest in this issue, there's an excellent analysis at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/fukushiima_analysis/ .
>>>>
>>>>Nice PR piece.
>>>
>>>LOL - I don't know how much you follow the Reg, but the entire staff there would consider that just about a mortal insult.
>>>
>>>No, if the Reg writes a piece like that, it's well-researched and the opinions expressed are the results of thorough analysis.
>>
>>I know, what is mainstream media thinking publishing pieces like this:
>>http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/fukushima-mark-nuclear-reactor-design-caused-ge-scientist/story?id=13141287
>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/mar/16/japan-nuclear-fire-fuel-pools-radiation
>>http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/16/japan.nuclear.reactors/index.html?hpt=T1
>
>If you relied on the media you would assume the east coast of Japan was now a radioactive wasteland.

What's really funny is see stories like this one:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/03/15/drug-stores-report-sudden-increase-potassium-iodide-sales/

and yet I don't know anyone (not in any state, CA, OR, WA, CO, or even NC) who is even considering purchasing potassium iodide pills....let alone panicking. It's not even discussed here and yet the article makes it seem as if everyone is running around panicking...

and then this:

U.S. urges citizens within 80 km of Japan plant leave:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/16/us-japan-usa-shelter-idUSTRE72F73J20110316