>We've seen numerous contradictory positions and statements on foreign affairs, but these statements on world currency top the cake:
>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/5050407/US-backing-for-world-currency-stuns-markets.html
>
>So what is the U.S. position exactly? I guess it depends on not only who you ask, but what day you ask...


Maybe for his next trick the Messiah could order a nuke strike on Omaha. That would do a job on the nation too.

What an a$$hole.

Of course this follows on his jello-like stance on the events in Libya, followed by his decisive backing of a no-fly zone and other measures now that any chance of making a difference (other than pi$$ing off Ghaddafi) is long gone. With some luck he can get us involved in a fight for absolutely no reason at all.

Not that I wanted us involved in Libya in any capacity other than arms broker and cheerleader for all sides. Somewhere, sometime a stand should be made clearly by B. Hussein Obama.