Just got my latest version of PC Mag that rated the best 50 products of 1996.

MS Access and Lotus Approach won for databases. That was gall enough to start. But then to say that MS Acess was the "most powerful database on the market" was absurd.

Why is it that VFP never gets its due in the PC Journals. Is it that MS doesn't want to put any bad press on Access and thus taint MS Office?

Clearly VFP is more flexible, faster, and more powerful than Access.