>Just got my latest version of PC Mag that rated the best 50 products of 1996.
>
>MS Access and Lotus Approach won for databases. That was gall enough to start. But then to say that MS Acess was the "most powerful database on the market" was absurd.
>
>Why is it that VFP never gets its due in the PC Journals. Is it that MS doesn't want to put any bad press on Access and thus taint MS Office?
>
>Clearly VFP is more flexible, faster, and more powerful than Access.

Like you said, this is the most ridiculous rating I ever seen. Are you there PC Mag?

We will save this rating and put it into our bumfire New Year party.

What a joke! If PC Mag continues to do rating like this, they might start loosing some customers. This is not a rating, this is false assumptions from the top to all the way down.

Thanks Todd for letting us know that.