>>This is my first time posting in the UT section and my first time asking for a new feature at all. Maybe it is selfish, since it is something I have been immersed in recently, but it's not just that. MVC and MVVM based approaches could not be hotter right now. IMO anyone who seriously understands these architectures and knows how to use them is set for the next five years, however the market hops. Which is long term in our business. This is the most engaged I have been technically in a lot of years. >> >>There are a million resources out there already. The UT is not going to become MVC Central. I just wanted to open the door and learn a little among friends, along with other resources. Here are some of the popular sites. Note all the free downloads and blogs. >> >>http://www.asp.net/mvc/mvc3 >>http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2011/01/18/asp-net-mvc-3-what-s-in-it-for-you.aspx >>http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg416514%28VS.98%29.aspx >>http://www.pluralsight-training.net/microsoft/olt/Courses.aspx >>http://mvcmusicstore.codeplex.com/ > >Would the actual ASP.NET category fit for the suggested ASP.NET MVC category. This is like a sub category of a category. Comment?
Yes, you're right. Even though MVC is very different from the WebForms style of ASP.NET, it's a logical section for posts about both of them.