>Just got my latest version of PC Mag that rated the best 50 products of 1996.
>
>MS Access and Lotus Approach won for databases. That was gall enough to start. But then to say that MS Acess was the "most powerful database on the market" was absurd.
>
>Why is it that VFP never gets its due in the PC Journals. Is it that MS doesn't want to put any bad press on Access and thus taint MS Office?
>
>Clearly VFP is more flexible, faster, and
Before we all get in a huff again over this Access vs VFP stuff, step back and look at the article again.....it was for END USER desktop databses. VFP is not in that catagory. I think we'l all agree that it is a developer tool.
Craig Berntson
MCSD, Microsoft .Net MVP, Grape City Community Influencer