General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
No, you don't need table buffering when locking one record in each 5 tables. Only if you need multiple locking in a single table.
What's important to understand is that the buffering applies to a single table, so you could have a table with row buffering (ie Invoice table) and another table using table buffering (ie Invoice_Items table).
HTH
>I have been researching which buffer mode to use when setting up persistent relationships. All the text I've read suggest that
>Optimistic record buffering/locking is 'generaly' preferable unless updating multiple rows - like in a grid.
>
>What about when 5 tables - in a DBC -are related. Does this count as multiple rows? Should I use Optimistic/Pessimistic TABLE buffering on all the tables in the relationship, only on the first, and what type buffering on the other tables in the relationship? TIA.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only