>>In a word, no. They (there are multiple "parties" not a single one) are based on fiscal responsibility, promotion of free markets and adhering to an originalist interpretation of the Constitution. Social issues are out-of-bounds for the majority of the affiliations.
>
>I concede, like any "group", the individuals vary widely.
>
>I can get behind the basic ideals of the Tea Party: I am for fiscal responsibility (who isn't), and free markets (I'm a small business owner), etc. The problem is the loudmouth racist bigots that seem to be the biggest proponents of the Tea Party movement. They think it's okay to be disrespectful towards the elected leader of our country. If instead they engaged in intelligent debate, perhaps their movement wouldn't have stalled.

Where were you when the local lunatic fringe here was callin bush names and worse....