< snip >

>I have little faith in the system as it has been completely corrupted. The very concept of a "living constitution" invalidates the Constitution itself. If it is not the supreme law of the land, but instead open to interpretation then all laws are subject to the same whims of political expediency.
>
>>> The courts recently have been negligent at best in their duty to the Constitution.
>>
< snip>

This is a really interesting statement. I'm hard pressed to imagine how any document created by human beings (especially in committee) could not be open to interpretation.

It seems to me that what you're really saying is that when you read it, you interpret it correctly and anyone who reads it differently is merely 'interpreting' it and should therefore be disallowed from doing so.

Of course, that's just my interpetation. ;)