> I spoke up for him when he was banned from the UT. That is fact.
>That is true. I never denied that. Others spoke up - because no reason was given.
>
> He told Michel I should be banned for posting an F bomb at him. That is fact. And it was three months, not two.
>
>I am tired of reminding you and that this is both incorrect and also a big distortion.
>
>I don't expect you to accept the facts, but for the record....
>
>1) June 13th of last year, here's your Message that started it: Message #1468721
>
>2) I think you knew immediately after that, that you'd get some type of discipline. You immediately posted one of your famous, "please ban me" posts...Message #1468806
>
>3) I had no intention of approaching Michel about your original message - but he emailed me and asked my opinion. I thought you needed to cool off, and I gave him my opinion of a 2 month suspension, but that ultimately it was his decision. When you learned that I'd been asked, you sent me a series of mildly vulgar emails out of anger. Even people who have bitterly disagreed with me thought I was right and you were seriously wrong.
>
>4) It was clearly two months (and not three), because your next message was on August 10th (actually, slightly less than 2 months, I guess it was 8 weeks). Message #1475933

Don't forget the phone call.