Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Update statements and triggers
Message
 
 
To
20/06/2011 18:22:51
General information
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Category:
Stored procedures, Triggers, UDFs
Environment versions
SQL Server:
SQL Server 2005
Application:
Web
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01515217
Message ID:
01515246
Views:
69
This message has been marked as the solution to the initial question of the thread.
An SQL Server trigger fires once per a statement regardless of how many records are affected. It's obvious that @iClaimPayersCount = @iMatchedPayersCount condition does not belong to UPDATE statement because it compares local variables only.

>I'm working on my first update trigger.
>
>An SP that operates on the column I'm monitoring for update includes this fragment
>
>
>UPDATE dbo.PATIENT_CLAIM_837_2000C
>SET Claim_Status = '00'
>WHERE Claim_Seq_No = @iClaimSeqNo 
>      AND @iClaimPayersCount = @iMatchedPayersCount
>
>
>
>Is there any reason THAT form is preferable to:
>
>IF @iClaimPayersCount = @iMatchedPayersCount
>    UPDATE dbo.PATIENT_CLAIM_837_2000C
>    SET Claim_Status = '00'
>    WHERE Claim_Seq_No = @iClaimSeqNo 
>      
>
>
>The second form seems more efficient, and it does not fire the trigger if
>
@iClaimPayersCount <> @iMatchedPayersCount
>
>The first form fires the trigger even if there is no update.
>
>Thanks for any advice.
>
>Bruce
--sb--
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform