>>>>>I have every clue about what I'm talking about and I have every right to say it as you do. I simply disagree with the majority of what you say. However, your reply to me is to say i don't have a clue or it's moronic or god is gonna get me. IOW, nothing substantive. Why do I think tea Party rallies sound the same way??
>>>>>
>>>>>Actually, the problem is that you don't think. When I read your posts, it reminds me of the old adage "It's mind over matter". I don't mind and you don't matter.
>>>>
>>>>Michel tossed him. He said the person was not who he claimed to be, someone who has a history here.
>>>
>>>He's still on here isn't he ?
>>
>>Not as far as I can see. No posts since yesterday afternoon, and Michel said outright that he had banned "Grover."
>
>I think you are misunderstanding. I suspect that Grover's account is locked down. That's a given. If not by Michel, then at the very least by the Grover impersonator in that they've thrown in the towel. We wont be seeing any more GL posts. But the Grover impersonator remains. And per Michel's comments, i get the feeling that its someone who posts regularly. Man up Harry Re... i mean Grover.

I'm a little confused. Michel said he knows exactly who it was. Why would he allow the real person to stick around?