>
as the consensus seems to be that Grover doesn't exists why argue with him ? >
>Good point <g>. I think I just have too much time on my hands this morning.
>
>I want to know who he really is...
So do quite a few other people. I suppose if Michael wanted to he could tell them they have to admit to it or face being banned...but like I said before it might just cause more problems.
ICQ 10556 (ya), 254117