>Your detailed message explains or resumes a lot of points I mentioned. But, as additional information, the 90 seconds is not in effect. It is like one person would use one account, do several clicks to read messages, post a new thread or a reply and switch into the other browser to use the other account and do the same. During that time, no other activity is done on the other account but an auto refresh, if the session remained opened. Yes, someone can log off the site from the main page. But, I have no record of that during that yoyo game that was played.
>
>But, without any doubt, someone tried to fool the system, Grover Lipscomb does not exist, contains a lot of bogus information in this account and the related activity was combined with the other account as a flip flop. But, as I said in the other thread, it was discovered because the member didn't think of that. For example, if one person would like to fool the system like that, that person could have done some mix hits on a regular basis which would have made pratically impossible for me to find the source. But, it was so precised, and it happened at various interval with exactly the same pattern that it made no doubt that it was the same person.
>
>For those who still haven't find the clue, the hawk in the address was part of the city name of the fake account. While this was not the prime source to start investigating, I found that to be quite curious. It might be a coincidence and could have no relation. But, on a scale, it only counted I would say for 2%. The above paragraph is and was a sure thing to identify the individual.
>
>It is a sad story. But, it reached a point that it wouldn't have made sense to continue to allow this as is without taking any action. In past stories, several years ago, some situations like that took about 1 to 3 months to be discovered. It is when a false move is done that we can see that something triggered suspicious activities. For example, we could still have on site people that are not using their real identities. It takes a lot of times, if they do not make any mistake, to discover them.

You did not answer my question.

Kitty Hawk is a real place and the KU Jayhawks is kevin's favorite team.

Also, if Kevin found a thread interesting or Grover's messages suspicious and monitored the thread or his posts (I think quite a few folks may have been doing so because a few contacted me on how strange they were), then wouldn't it make sense for Kevin to log in to the UT or switch back to his browser while on his pc to view messages each time after Grover posted? Especially if there were any email notifications when Grover posted (or UT notifications for that matter).

A couple folks did ask me privately if I thought it was Kevin -- only after you suggested in your message the co related information. However, more folks asked me privately if I thought it might be a couple of other folks. I won't post their names publicly here, because I think it is wrong to suggest anyone without sufficient evidence and would not cast a negative light on anyone without justification and cause. When Grover's posts became outrageous, many people were suspicious and suspecting a few members.

That may be the case for a few folks. That is why I asked: Did you run the same algorithm on all members?

.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"