>>>Although the interesting element here at UT a good portion of the call for banning is caused in some ways by MVP (so you mentionned) , and your site seems to attract a good bunch of them, more than others anyways. Corrolation between MVPs and banning maybe.
>>
>>This is the sad part. Is it because some benefit from their high profile in regards to that and try to go a little further to the borderline of the Terms & Conditions of this site and, sometimes, go over it. It proves one thing however. No matter the status of one person, we are all human beings and the rules of a site, such as this one, applies to all.
>
>I go way overboard in the opposite direction ... I'm extremely careful to NOT step on other people's toes or to use harsh words. I am respectful of my MVP status and what it represents. You won't ever see me pushing that T&C envelope; nor, I suspect, will most other MVPs.
>
>It's unfortunate that a correlation between being an MVP and deserving to be banned has even been mentioned here (see, I even tippy-toe around that ... you don't want to hear what I actually think about that ridiculous supposition).
>
>~~Bonnie

Being an MVP bestows no particular moral high ground on a person. Being technically skilled does not make one a better person ("better" being a very subjective word). In fact, being able to become an MVP might show an ambitious streak which might manifest itself in other less desirable ways. Michel's observations of past altercations involving MVPs is interesting I think :)