>>>Last time I checked this site was owned my Michel and therefor he can do whatever he wants with it.
>
>And IMHO he would be a fool to explain exactly how he identified somebody who went to great lengths to cover their tracks, or to participate any further in these discussions.
>
>As I said earlier, I feel sorry for Kevin but I'm absolutely sure that if he didn't do it, he needs to convince UT management rather than sending smoke signals via proxies here.
>
>I also have another suggestion: limit daily chatter posts to 3 for people who have not had a post marked as a technical solution by a different person in the last month. This is similar to eBay's strategy. It incentivizes contribution, prevents endless tail-chasing as we're seeing here and dis-empowers the saboteurs in the first place.
I don't see why chatter should have a limit.
Myabe you shouldn't be banned for anything that appears in chatter only for messing up technical threads.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement