>It would be a lot smaller, that's for sure. Which may be why you put up with the aggro.
>
>My take on this whole saga is that if you really believe Kevin was Grover you should meet a higher burden of proof. I am in lockstep with Tracy's thoughts on this (a rarity) in that you are making a serious accusation against Kevin, one that could have serious repercussions for him in a wide open online world. You have a gut feel, and maybe some proof you have not disclosed, but clearly a number of members do not believe Kevin was behind this and want something substantive before accepting it.
>
>I don't believe it was him and won't accept that it was until you convince me otherwise. Things have surprised me before. I just need to be convinced. So far I'm not.

You do not have to feel that you need to be convince. My role is to build and maintain this Web site as I see fit based on the Terms & Conditions of the site. And, yes, of course, we cannot disclose everything. Certain things have to remain confidential. Basically, there shouldn't have been any intervention on my part to reply to anything in this thread but to the initial message I created. This is usually not like that also on other Web sites. It doesn't mean it has to be like that here. But, it is.