>>>I think we are all in agreement that what "Grover" did was unacceptable, even if there were not formal Terms and Conditions. There is no excuse and the perpetrator should be banned. The discontent is over whether that perpetrator is truly known. If you clear the air completely it will settle the UT down for all of us.
>>
>>You lost me here. I am not familiar with the last sentence you wrote.
>
>"Clear the air completely"? What I meant was disclose enough information to convince us Kevin was not falsely accused. Here is an idea -- disclose it privately to a member we all respect and trust, someone who will not disclose that information to anyone, and let that person give the rest of us a simple "agreed" or "disagreed." Because this lifetime ban is a serious accusation that could damage his reputation and career even if he is in fact innocent.
>
>Over and out from me on this topic. I think my last suggestion was a good one. As we all know, it's up to you what happens from here.

I suspect if the information is enough to absolutely convince Michel, it won't look any different to anyone else. But that doesn't change the fact that it could still be a setup (or even a strange accident).

For my money, I think Michel has been had, but that's just my opinion.